disapproving cry of shakespearean characters

Voc Authors

2 min read

·

23-11-2024

27

0

Share

A Plague o' Both Your Houses! Disapproving Cries in Shakespeare

Shakespeare's characters, vibrant and volatile, weren't known for their polite disagreements. Their expressions of disapproval weren't subtle murmurs of dissent, but rather thunderous pronouncements, eloquent invectives, and dramatic pronouncements calculated to sting and shame. From the witty barbs of Rosalind to the furious pronouncements of Lear, Shakespeare’s plays are a treasure trove of disapproving cries, each reflecting the unique personality and social standing of the speaker.

The nature of these cries varied depending on context and character. Consider the aristocratic disdain:

• "Fie on thee!" This exclamation, often accompanied by a gesture of disgust, expressed utter contempt and rejection. It wasn't merely disapproval; it was a declaration of moral superiority, implying the speaker was irrevocably superior to the object of their scorn. The inherent class distinction adds weight to the disapproval, suggesting the speaker finds the offending action beneath them.

• "Out, alas!" This cry, while seemingly lamenting, often served as a veiled expression of disapproval. The "alas" concealed a deeper dissatisfaction, suggesting a disappointment at the unfolding events or the actions of another character. It carried a sense of frustrated helplessness, conveying a profound sense of disapproval without explicit accusation.

The commoners, meanwhile, relied on more visceral expressions:

• "A plague o' both your houses!" This famous line from Romeo and Juliet, spoken by Mercutio as he lies dying, isn't merely a curse; it’s a devastating condemnation of the feud that has led to his demise. The breadth of the curse underscores the depth of his disapproval, encompassing both families responsible for the tragedy. It's a potent expression of frustration and anger at the futility of their conflict.

• "Zounds!" A common exclamation, "Zounds" – a contraction of "God's wounds" – expressed a mixture of surprise, anger, and disapproval. Its informal nature reflects the speaker's less-refined social standing, yet its intensity is undeniable. It signals a strong negative reaction, often accompanied by further, more explicit pronouncements of anger or dissatisfaction.

Beyond the explicitly stated cries, Shakespeare masterfully conveyed disapproval through subtle nuances of language:

• Sarcasm and Irony: Characters often expressed their disapproval through cutting remarks disguised as compliments, highlighting the hypocrisy or foolishness of the target's actions. This subtle form of disapproval was particularly effective in highlighting the character's intelligence and wit.

• Understatement: A quiet, almost resigned sigh or a murmured aside could convey deeper disapproval than a loud outburst. This technique, particularly effective in portraying weary or disillusioned characters, added layers of meaning to the simple act of disapproving.

Shakespeare’s genius lies in his ability to craft disapproving cries that are both theatrically effective and psychologically revealing. They serve not only to advance the plot but also to illuminate the characters' inner lives, motivations, and social contexts. The depth and variety of these expressions continue to resonate with audiences centuries later, underscoring the enduring power of Shakespeare's language and the timeless nature of human disapproval.